St. Joe Paper Co. v. Nickelson

108 So. 2d 626
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1959
DocketNo. A-453
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 108 So. 2d 626 (St. Joe Paper Co. v. Nickelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Joe Paper Co. v. Nickelson, 108 So. 2d 626 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ of certiorari to an order of the Florida Industrial Commission which vacated an order of its Deputy Commissioner in a workmen’s compensation proceeding. The Deputy Commissioner found that petitioner was not the employer of respondent. The Commission reversed this order on the ground that there was sufficient substantial evidence for holding that respondent was the employer of petitioner. We have examined the record and briefs of counsel and are of the opinion that, while there is evidence in the record from which the Commission could conclude as it did, nevertheless, there is also in the record sufficient competent substantial evidence to sustain the findings of the Deputy Commissioner.

Therefore, the findings of the Deputy Commissioner must be affirmed in accordance with the long-established rule in this state that the Deputy Commissioner is the sole trier of the facts in a workmen’s compensation claim proceeding, whose findings should be upheld unless there is no competent substantial evidence which accords with reason and logic to sustain them. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Fla., 55 So.2d 741. See also another recent opinion involving the pulpwood industry, Lindsey v. Willis, Fla.App., 101 So.2d 422.

It is therefore ordered that the writ of certiorari be issued and the order of the Commission be quashed. The cause is remanded for the entry of an order reinstating the order of the Deputy Commissioner.

It is so ordered.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. St. Joe Paper Co.
118 So. 2d 77 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-joe-paper-co-v-nickelson-fladistctapp-1959.