St. Jean v. State
This text of 721 So. 2d 448 (St. Jean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Yves St. Jean appeals his conviction for manslaughter, contending that there should be a reversal on account of a portion of the closing argument by the prosecutor. We conclude that the objected-to argument was fair reply to the defendant’s own closing argument, which charged improper police interrogation techniques. See Ferguson v. State, 417 So.2d 639, 641-42 (Fla.1982); Kent v. State, 702 So.2d 266, 269 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 533 (Fla.1998); Meeks v. State, 667 So.2d 1002, 1002-03 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 So. 2d 448, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15354, 1998 WL 876919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-jean-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.