St. Hiliare v. BKO Express, LLC

134 A.D.3d 923, 20 N.Y.S.3d 904
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 2015
Docket2013-11314
StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.3d 923 (St. Hiliare v. BKO Express, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Hiliare v. BKO Express, LLC, 134 A.D.3d 923, 20 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated September 18, 2013, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages finding that the plaintiff sustained a serious injury under the significant limitation of use category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $495,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants’ sole contention, that the jury verdict finding that the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident was not based on legally sufficient evidence, is unpreserved for appellate review, as the appellants did not raise that issue in the trial court (see Samouelian v Amroan, 127 AD3d *924 723, 723 [2015]; Volino v Long Is. R.R. Co., 83 AD3d 693 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Volino v. Long Island Rail Road
83 A.D.3d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 923, 20 N.Y.S.3d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-hiliare-v-bko-express-llc-nyappdiv-2015.