St. Florant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Florant v. State

922 So. 2d 456, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3550, 2006 WL 626092

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2006

DocketNo. 3D04-1061

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 922 So. 2d 456 (St. Florant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Florant v. State, 922 So. 2d 456, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3550, 2006 WL 626092 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s appropriate confession of error, we reverse and vacate the written sentencing order dated October 31, 2003, and remand with instructions either to [457]*457conform the sentencing order to the trial court’s oral pronouncement as to Counts 1 to 5 and 7 to 12 (i.e., 50 years), or to recalculate the appellant’s sentences as to these counts.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s appropriate confession of error, we reverse and vacate the written sentencing order dated October 31, 2003, and remand with instructions either to [457]*457conform the sentencing order to the trial court’s oral pronouncement as to Counts 1 to 5 and 7 to 12 (i.e., 50 years), or to recalculate the appellant’s sentences as to these counts.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 So. 2d 456, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3550, 2006 WL 626092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-florant-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack