St. Fleur v. City of Scranton
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GARY ST. FLEUR, NICHOLAS GETTEL, : No. 26 MM 2020 CASEY DURKIN, DAMIAN BIANCERELLI, : RICH JOHNSON, ETHAN GREEN, : ANGELA GILGALLON, AND MICHELE : MCGOVERN, :
:
Respondents :
:
v. :
:
THE CITY OF SCRANTON, PAIGE : COGNETTI, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SCRANTON, : AND PATRICK SHERIDAN, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS BUSINESS : ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF : SCRANTON, :
:
Petitioners :
:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Application “for Leave to File
Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S.A. §
726, or in the Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” the Application “for Leave to File
Nunc Pro Tunc a Notice of Intent to File Amicus Brief and in Support of Petitioner’s
Petition for Extraordinary or King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” and the Application “for Leave to
File a Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42
Pa.C.S.A. § 726 or in the alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” are GRANTED.
The “Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S. §726, or in the
Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Fleur v. City of Scranton (St. Fleur v. City of Scranton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.