St. Fleur v. City of Scranton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 22, 2020·No. 26 MM 2020·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

GARY ST. FLEUR, NICHOLAS GETTEL, : No. 26 MM 2020 CASEY DURKIN, DAMIAN BIANCERELLI, : RICH JOHNSON, ETHAN GREEN, : ANGELA GILGALLON, AND MICHELE : MCGOVERN, :

:

Respondents :

:

v. :

:

THE CITY OF SCRANTON, PAIGE : COGNETTI, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SCRANTON, : AND PATRICK SHERIDAN, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS BUSINESS : ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF : SCRANTON, :

:

Petitioners :

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Application “for Leave to File

Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S.A. §

726, or in the Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” the Application “for Leave to File

Nunc Pro Tunc a Notice of Intent to File Amicus Brief and in Support of Petitioner’s

Petition for Extraordinary or King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” and the Application “for Leave to

File a Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42

Pa.C.S.A. § 726 or in the alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” are GRANTED.

The “Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S. §726, or in the

Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Fleur v. City of Scranton, (Pa. 2020).

St. Fleur v. City of Scranton (St. Fleur v. City of Scranton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 726
Pennsylvania § 726