St. Fleur v. City of Scranton
This text of St. Fleur v. City of Scranton (St. Fleur v. City of Scranton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GARY ST. FLEUR, NICHOLAS GETTEL, : No. 26 MM 2020 CASEY DURKIN, DAMIAN BIANCERELLI, : RICH JOHNSON, ETHAN GREEN, : ANGELA GILGALLON, AND MICHELE : MCGOVERN, : : Respondents : : v. : : THE CITY OF SCRANTON, PAIGE : COGNETTI, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY : AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SCRANTON, : AND PATRICK SHERIDAN, IN HIS : OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS BUSINESS : ADMINISTRATOR OF THE CITY OF : SCRANTON, : : Petitioners : :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2020, the Application “for Leave to File
Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S.A. §
726, or in the Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” the Application “for Leave to File
Nunc Pro Tunc a Notice of Intent to File Amicus Brief and in Support of Petitioner’s
Petition for Extraordinary or King’s Bench Jurisdiction,” and the Application “for Leave to
File a Response in Support of the Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42
Pa.C.S.A. § 726 or in the alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” are GRANTED.
The “Petition for Extraordinary Jurisdiction under 42 Pa.C.S. §726, or in the
Alternative, King’s Bench Jurisdiction” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
St. Fleur v. City of Scranton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-fleur-v-city-of-scranton-pa-2020.