St. Elmo Hawkins v. General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Motors Corporation, and George R. Jones, T/a Beale and Jones

427 F.2d 148, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9109
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1970
Docket13955
StatusPublished

This text of 427 F.2d 148 (St. Elmo Hawkins v. General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Motors Corporation, and George R. Jones, T/a Beale and Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Elmo Hawkins v. General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Motors Corporation, and George R. Jones, T/a Beale and Jones, 427 F.2d 148, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9109 (4th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

St. Elmo Hawkins has sued his former patent attorney, General Motors Corporation and Chrysler Corporation for misappropriation of an invention. The trial judge afforded plaintiff every opportunity to prove his allegations, but Hawkins was able to demonstrate neither the existence of a conspiracy nor actionable negligence on the part of the attorney. Finding no error in the District Court’s disposition of this case, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 F.2d 148, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-elmo-hawkins-v-general-motors-corporation-chrysler-motors-ca4-1970.