St. Elmo Hawkins v. General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Motors Corporation, and George R. Jones, T/a Beale and Jones
This text of 427 F.2d 148 (St. Elmo Hawkins v. General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Motors Corporation, and George R. Jones, T/a Beale and Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
St. Elmo Hawkins has sued his former patent attorney, General Motors Corporation and Chrysler Corporation for misappropriation of an invention. The trial judge afforded plaintiff every opportunity to prove his allegations, but Hawkins was able to demonstrate neither the existence of a conspiracy nor actionable negligence on the part of the attorney. Finding no error in the District Court’s disposition of this case, the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 F.2d 148, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-elmo-hawkins-v-general-motors-corporation-chrysler-motors-ca4-1970.