St. Denis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Denis v. State

128 So. 3d 950, 2013 WL 6816619, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20389

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 27, 2013

DocketNo. 5D13-3269

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 128 So. 3d 950 (St. Denis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Denis v. State, 128 So. 3d 950, 2013 WL 6816619, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20389 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dallas Murphy St. Denis appeals an order denying his motion to correct jail credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm the order on appeal without elaboration, but remand with directions that the trial court correct the sentencing documents in case nos. 09-CF-714, 09-CF-715, 09-CF-1073 and 09-CF-1108. The “prison credit” box on the sentencing forms for these cases is not checked, although other sentencing documents and the transcript from Defendant’s violation of probation sentencing hearing make clear that the trial judge intended to direct the Department of Corrections to credit the Defendant with the time he had spent in prison previously on these charges when sentencing the Defendant to prison (for the second time) after his post-prison violations of probation. The corrected documents should then be forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED; and REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR IN SENTENCING DOCUMENTS.

ORFINGER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dallas Murphy St. Denis appeals an order denying his motion to correct jail credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm the order on appeal without elaboration, but remand with directions that the trial court correct the sentencing documents in case nos. 09-CF-714, 09-CF-715, 09-CF-1073 and 09-CF-1108. The “prison credit” box on the sentencing forms for these cases is not checked, although other sentencing documents and the transcript from Defendant’s violation of probation sentencing hearing make clear that the trial judge intended to direct the Department of Corrections to credit the Defendant with the time he had spent in prison previously on these charges when sentencing the Defendant to prison (for the second time) after his post-prison violations of probation. The corrected documents should then be forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED; and REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR IN SENTENCING DOCUMENTS.

ORFINGER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 3d 950, 2013 WL 6816619, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-denis-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack