St. Croix Lumber Co. v. Mitchell
6 Dakota 215
Opinion
This case is reversed upon the ground that the law of 1883, which repealed the statute of 1877, in so far as it required notice to be given to the owner of the premises, affected the remedy only, and the court below erred in holding such notice essential to the validity of the lien for materials furnished after the passage of such law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Croix Lumber Co. v. Mitchell, 6 Dakota 215 (dakotasup 1889).
6 Dakota 215 (St. Croix Lumber Co. v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Larson Concrete Co. v. Stroschein
353 N.W.2d 354 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
St. Croix Lumber Co. v. Mitchell
57 N.W. 236 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)