St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels
This text of 56 N.W. 592 (St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal in this action must be sustained. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace. Issue was joined, and plaintiff recovered judgment against Mary Karels for $15 and costs. She appealed to the district court upon questions of law alone. There the judg[157]*157ment of tbe justice’s court was affirmed. She tbeu moved for a new trial in tbe district court, where tbe motion was denied, and sbe appeals to tbis court from tbe order denying a new trial. Such an order is not appealable. Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, (34 N. W. Rep. 739.)
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.W. 592, 55 Minn. 155, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-cloud-common-council-v-karels-minn-1893.