St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels
Opinion
The motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal in this action must be sustained. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace. Issue was joined, and plaintiff recovered judgment against Mary Karels for $15 and costs. She appealed to the district court upon questions of law alone. There the judg[157]*157ment of tbe justice’s court was affirmed. She tbeu moved for a new trial in tbe district court, where tbe motion was denied, and sbe appeals to tbis court from tbe order denying a new trial. Such an order is not appealable. Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, (34 N. W. Rep. 739.)
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
56 N.W. 592 (St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.