St. Clair v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

St. Clair v. State

107 S.E. 567, 27 Ga. App. 43, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 669

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 11, 1921

Docket12272

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 567 (St. Clair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Clair v. State, 107 S.E. 567, 27 Ga. App. 43, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

St. Clair was indicted for the offense of carrying concealed weapons, and for carrying a pistol without first taking out a license from the ordinary. The evidence authorized, if indeed it did not demand, the conviction of the defendant. The two special assignments of error, upon the admission of evidence, are without'merit. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

St. Clair was indicted for the offense of carrying concealed weapons, and for carrying a pistol without first taking out a license from the ordinary. The evidence authorized, if indeed it did not demand, the conviction of the defendant. The two special assignments of error, upon the admission of evidence, are without'merit. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., eoneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E. 567, 27 Ga. App. 43, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-clair-v-state-gactapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack