St. Clair v. Hufnagle
This text of 1913 OK 74 (St. Clair v. Hufnagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for defendants in error moves to dismiss this proceeding in error on the ground that “more than one year elapsed after final judgment in the trial court and be^ fore the petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court; that the motion for a new trial was overruled in the trial court on the 11th day of February, 1911, and the petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court on the Í3th day of February, 1912.”
The record bears out the contention of the defendants in error. The motion to dismiss is sustained. Richardson et vir v. Beidleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 Pac. 816.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1913 OK 74, 131 P. 171, 35 Okla. 394, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-clair-v-hufnagle-okla-1913.