St. Clair Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. P. J. Holloran Co.

Eighth Circuit

St. Clair Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. P. J. Holloran Co.

487 F.2d 516

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 14, 1973

DocketNo. 73-1612

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 487 F.2d 516 (St. Clair Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. P. J. Holloran Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Clair Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. P. J. Holloran Co., 487 F.2d 516 (8th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court, 362 F.Supp. 370, is based on findings of fact that have not been shown to be clearly erroneous as they pertain to the essential elements of the ease. The issues raised are primarily factual, and the District Court’s finding that the debt asserted by St. Clair Laundry & Dry Cleaning Company, Inc., is not provable for an involuntary petition in bankruptcy has not been shown to be clearly erroneous in fact or based upon any misinterpretation of the law. We believe that an opinion would have no precedential value, and the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed without opinion. See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court, 362 F.Supp. 370, is based on findings of fact that have not been shown to be clearly erroneous as they pertain to the essential elements of the ease. The issues raised are primarily factual, and the District Court’s finding that the debt asserted by St. Clair Laundry & Dry Cleaning Company, Inc., is not provable for an involuntary petition in bankruptcy has not been shown to be clearly erroneous in fact or based upon any misinterpretation of the law. We believe that an opinion would have no precedential value, and the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed without opinion. See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 F.2d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-clair-laundry-dry-cleaning-co-v-p-j-holloran-co-ca8-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack