St. Clair County v. Lovingston

85 U.S. 628, 21 L. Ed. 813, 18 Wall. 628, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1337
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 22, 1873·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice STRONG

delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of error in this case must be dismissed on the authority of Moore v. Robbins, decided at this term. The judgment of the Supreme Court of the State cannot be regarded as a final judgment in the sense in-which the term was used in the Judiciary Acts. No judgment is final which does not terminate .the litigation between the parties to the *629 suit. The issue between the parties may be again tried in the Circuit Court, and another judgment may be recovered, which may be removed to the Supreme Court for revision. Consequently, then, there has been no final determination of the case.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Clair County v. Lovingston, 85 U.S. 628, 21 L. Ed. 813, 18 Wall. 628, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1337 (1873).

85 U.S. 628 (St. Clair County v. Lovingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Maryanov
20 F.2d 939 (E.D. New York, 1927)
Page v. Town of Gallup
191 P. 460 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1920)
F. E. Davis & Co. v. Illinois-Pacific Glass Co.
22 Haw. 303 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1914)
Clement v. Wilson
135 F. 749 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Morgan v. Thompson
124 F. 203 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield
183 U.S. 130 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham
162 U.S. 339 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Second Street
29 A. 294 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)
Taylor v. Matteson
56 N.W. 829 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1893)
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. Waikapu Sugar Co.
8 Haw. 721 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1891)
Harris Manufacturing Co. v. Walsh
2 Dakota 41 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1878)
Town of Ohio v. Marcy
85 U.S. 552 (Supreme Court, 1873)