St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand & Car Transfer Co.

Seventh Circuit

St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand & Car Transfer Co.

110 F. 785, 49 C.C.A. 169, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4340

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 9, 1901

DocketNo. 798

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 F. 785 (St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand & Car Transfer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand & Car Transfer Co., 110 F. 785, 49 C.C.A. 169, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4340 (7th Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error brought suit to recover certain penalties aggregating $240,000, being $3 per car for 80,000 railroad cars carried over the Mississippi river on a ferry maintained by the defendant in error between the city of St. Louis, in the state of Missouri, and the city of East St. Louis, in the county of St. Clair, in the state of Illinois, upon the ground that the defendant in error had failed to procure from the plaintiff in error a license to maintain and operate such ferry, pursuant to the requirements of an act entitled “An act to revise the law in relation to ferries,” in force July 1, 1874 (Starr & C. Ann. St. Ill. c. 55). The court below sustained a demurrer to the declaration, holding the act of the legislature to be repugnant to the constitution of the United States. 109 Fed. 741. From final j'udgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit a writ of error is sued out from this court to review the judgment.

The sole question arising and presented for consideration goes to the validity of the statute of the state of Illinois. It is claimed upon the one hand and denied upon the other that this statute is in contravention of the constitution of the United States. We are without authority to determine the question. The fifth section of the act creating the circuit court of appeals (26 Stat. 826, c. 517) provides that in such cases a review can only be had in the supreme court. Holt v. Manufacturing Co., 23 C. C. A. 301, 80 Fed. 1, and cases cited; Ex parte Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399, 14 Sup. Ct. 123, 37 L. Ed. 1120; Osborne v. Florida, 164 U. S. 650, 656, 17 Sup. Ct. 214, 41 L. Ed. 586; Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. City of Austin, 168 U. S. 685, 694, 18 Sup. Ct. 223, 42 L. Ed. 626; Town of Westerly v. Westerly Water Works, 22 C. C. A. 278, 76 Fed. 467.

The writ of error is dismissed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error brought suit to recover certain penalties aggregating $240,000, being $3 per car for 80,000 railroad cars carried over the Mississippi river on a ferry maintained by the defendant in error between the city of St. Louis, in the state of Missouri, and the city of East St. Louis, in the county of St. Clair, in the state of Illinois, upon the ground that the defendant in error had failed to procure from the plaintiff in error a license to maintain and operate such ferry, pursuant to the requirements of an act entitled “An act to revise the law in relation to ferries,” in force July 1, 1874 (Starr & C. Ann. St. Ill. c. 55). The court below sustained a demurrer to the declaration, holding the act of the legislature to be repugnant to the constitution of the United States. 109 Fed. 741. From final j'udgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit a writ of error is sued out from this court to review the judgment.

The sole question arising and presented for consideration goes to the validity of the statute of the state of Illinois. It is claimed upon the one hand and denied upon the other that this statute is in contravention of the constitution of the United States. We are without authority to determine the question. The fifth section of the act creating the circuit court of appeals (26 Stat. 826, c. 517) provides that in such cases a review can only be had in the supreme court. Holt v. Manufacturing Co., 23 C. C. A. 301, 80 Fed. 1, and cases cited; Ex parte Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399, 14 Sup. Ct. 123, 37 L. Ed. 1120; Osborne v. Florida, 164 U. S. 650, 656, 17 Sup. Ct. 214, 41 L. Ed. 586; Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. City of Austin, 168 U. S. 685, 694, 18 Sup. Ct. 223, 42 L. Ed. 626; Town of Westerly v. Westerly Water Works, 22 C. C. A. 278, 76 Fed. 467.

The writ of error is dismissed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 F. 785, 49 C.C.A. 169, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-clair-county-v-interstate-sand-car-transfer-co-ca7-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack