St. Augustine Beach Investors, Ltd. v. McGlinchy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Augustine Beach Investors, Ltd. v. McGlinchy

717 So. 2d 556, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8099, 1998 WL 374909

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1998

DocketNo. 98-881

StatusPublished

This text of 717 So. 2d 556 (St. Augustine Beach Investors, Ltd. v. McGlinchy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Augustine Beach Investors, Ltd. v. McGlinchy, 717 So. 2d 556, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8099, 1998 WL 374909 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

St. Augustine Beach Investors, Ltd. (“Beach Investors”) and H.I. Development Corporation (“H.I.Development”), appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss/transfer a personal injury claim brought in Dade Coun[557]*557ty by appellees, James McGlinehy, Jr., and Wendy McGlinehy (“appellees”). We reverse finding the trial court erred in denying the motion to transfer venue.

The appellees brought suit after James suffered injuries as a result of a slip and fall while at the St. Augustine Beach Holiday Inn (“the hotel”). The hotel is located in St. Johns County, Florida, and is owned by Beach Investors. Beach Investors is a New York corporation. Its registered agent for service of process is listed in Tallahassee, Florida. H.I. Development is Florida corporation with agents and representatives in St. Johns County and Dade County.

Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that actions against foreign corporations doing business in Florida may be brought where the corporation has an agent or other representative, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. While Beach Investors may not have an “agent” in St. Johns County, it does have a “representative.” Beach Investors ownership and operation of the hotel suffices to establish the existence of a representative for venue purposes under Section 47.051. See Piper Aircraft Corporation v. Schwendemann, 564 So.2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 577 So.2d 1328 (Fla.1991); Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Shirley, 501 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Thus the record demonstrates that Beach Investors and H.I. Development share a common county of residency in St. Johns County, and accordingly venue does not lie in Dade County. See Valjean Corp. v. Heininger, 559 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Premier Cruise Lines, Ltd., Inc. v. Gavrilis, 554 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). For these reasons, we reverse and remand with instructions to transfer the case to St. Johns County. See Bumup & Sims Telcom, Inc. v. McCrone, 590 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

St. Augustine Beach Investors, Ltd. (“Beach Investors”) and H.I. Development Corporation (“H.I.Development”), appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss/transfer a personal injury claim brought in Dade Coun[557]*557ty by appellees, James McGlinehy, Jr., and Wendy McGlinehy (“appellees”). We reverse finding the trial court erred in denying the motion to transfer venue.

The appellees brought suit after James suffered injuries as a result of a slip and fall while at the St. Augustine Beach Holiday Inn (“the hotel”). The hotel is located in St. Johns County, Florida, and is owned by Beach Investors. Beach Investors is a New York corporation. Its registered agent for service of process is listed in Tallahassee, Florida. H.I. Development is Florida corporation with agents and representatives in St. Johns County and Dade County.

Section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that actions against foreign corporations doing business in Florida may be brought where the corporation has an agent or other representative, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. While Beach Investors may not have an “agent” in St. Johns County, it does have a “representative.” Beach Investors ownership and operation of the hotel suffices to establish the existence of a representative for venue purposes under Section 47.051. See Piper Aircraft Corporation v. Schwendemann, 564 So.2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 577 So.2d 1328 (Fla.1991); Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Shirley, 501 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Thus the record demonstrates that Beach Investors and H.I. Development share a common county of residency in St. Johns County, and accordingly venue does not lie in Dade County. See Valjean Corp. v. Heininger, 559 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Premier Cruise Lines, Ltd., Inc. v. Gavrilis, 554 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). For these reasons, we reverse and remand with instructions to transfer the case to St. Johns County. See Bumup & Sims Telcom, Inc. v. McCrone, 590 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 So. 2d 556, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8099, 1998 WL 374909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-augustine-beach-investors-ltd-v-mcglinchy-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack