St. Aubin, Keith Michael
This text of St. Aubin, Keith Michael (St. Aubin, Keith Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NOS. WR-49,980-12;WR-49,980-13;WR-49,980-14;WR-49,980-15;WR-49,980-16
Ex parte KEITH MICHAEL ST. AUBIN, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 98CR0360; 98CR0362; 98CR0358; 98CR0359; 98CR0361 IN THE 10TH DISTRICT COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of four counts
of attempted capital murder and one count of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in each
cause. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. St. Aubin v. State, Nos. 01-98-01340-
CR; 01-98-01342-CR; 01-98-01318-CR; 01-98-01339-CR; 01-98-01341-CR (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] May 25, 2000)(not designated for publication). Applicant’s initial applications for habeas
corpus relief were denied in 2002. St. Aubin - 2
Applicant filed these subsequent applications for habeas corpus relief contending that all of
his convictions involve the murder of the same victim as an element to the offenses and therefore
only one conviction can stand under this Court’s double jeopardy laws. We order that this
application be filed and set for submission to determine whether Applicant’s claim that he has
received multiple punishments for the same conduct in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of
the Sixth Amendment overcomes the statutory procedural bar against successive habeas applications.
The parties shall brief these issues. Oral argument is not permitted.
It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. Applicant’s brief shall be filed with this
Court within 30 days of the date of this order. The State’s response shall be filed within 30 days after
the filing of Applicant’s brief.
Filed: June 15, 2016 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
St. Aubin, Keith Michael, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-aubin-keith-michael-texcrimapp-2016.