St. Angelo v. Yurko

879 A.2d 178, 583 Pa. 465, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1486
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 20, 2005
DocketNo. 47 WAL 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 879 A.2d 178 (St. Angelo v. Yurko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Angelo v. Yurko, 879 A.2d 178, 583 Pa. 465, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1486 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

[466]*466 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED; the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED; the judgment of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County is VACATED; and this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County for a new hearing on Respondents indirect criminal contempt complaint. Commonwealth v. Crawford, 466 Pa. 269, 352 A.2d 52 (1976); Commonwealth v. Starr, 541 Pa. 564, 664 A.2d 1326 (1996); Pa.R.Crim. P. 318(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Starr
664 A.2d 1326 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Crawford
352 A.2d 52 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
879 A.2d 178, 583 Pa. 465, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-angelo-v-yurko-pa-2005.