St. Andrews Links, Inc. v. City of Dunedin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Andrews Links, Inc. v. City of Dunedin

508 So. 2d 38, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1419, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8593

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 1987

DocketNo. 86-2702

StatusPublished

This text of 508 So. 2d 38 (St. Andrews Links, Inc. v. City of Dunedin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Andrews Links, Inc. v. City of Dunedin, 508 So. 2d 38, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1419, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that appellant landowners, who do not contest the facial constitutionality of the city ordinance involved in this case, have failed to show the lack of any rational nexus between the impact fee imposed under that ordinance by the City and a planned residential development on appellants’ land. See Wald Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 338 So.2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). We find no merit in the other contention on appeal which is to the effect that a prior stipulation between the parties, which did not refer to such a fee, should be construed to preclude the fee.

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that appellant landowners, who do not contest the facial constitutionality of the city ordinance involved in this case, have failed to show the lack of any rational nexus between the impact fee imposed under that ordinance by the City and a planned residential development on appellants’ land. See Wald Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 338 So.2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). We find no merit in the other contention on appeal which is to the effect that a prior stipulation between the parties, which did not refer to such a fee, should be construed to preclude the fee.

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

508 So. 2d 38, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1419, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-andrews-links-inc-v-city-of-dunedin-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack