St. Amand v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.

104 F. App'x 193
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2004
Docket04-1019
StatusPublished

This text of 104 F. App'x 193 (St. Amand v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Amand v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., 104 F. App'x 193 (1st Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have read the briefs in this case, listened attentively to oral arguments, and reviewed the record with care. We conclude, without serious question, that the district court appropriately granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The material facts are not genuinely in dispute. The legal principles that govern this case are well-settled and the district court applied those principles faultlessly. Consequently, we summarily affirm the judgment below, substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s bench decision of November 5, 2003, and its sub *194 sequent memorandum and order dated November 6, 2003.

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-amand-v-smurfit-stone-container-corp-ca1-2004.