(SS)Moncibaiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 5, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-01649·Unknown

Opinion

ROCIO MONCIBAIZ, No. 1:20-cv-01649-HBK

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTNG AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER COMMISSIONER OF THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. No. 17) Defendant.

Pending before the court is the parties’ stipulated motion for attorney fees filed on January 5, 2022. (Doc. No. 17). The parties agree to an award attorney’s fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney in the amount of $2,533.92 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Id.). On October 15, 2021, this Court granted the parties’ Stipulation for Voluntary Remand pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and reversed and remanded the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 16). Plaintiff now requests an award of fees as the prevailing party under that order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a) & (d)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); see 28 U.S.C. § 1920; cf. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993) (concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party). The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. (See Doc. No. 17). After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees and costs, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to plaintiffs counsel. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs stipulated motion for attorney fees and expenses (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of two thousand eight hundred and twenty-five dollars ($2,533.92) in attorney fees and expenses. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government must pay the fees to plaintiffs counsel in accordance with plaintiffs assignment of fees and subject to the terms of the stipulated motion. Dated: _ January 5, 2022 Mile. Wh. foareh Zaskth HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS)Moncibaiz v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

(SS)Moncibaiz v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS)Moncibaiz v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)