SSM Consulting LLC v. CTI Teksource LLC

112 A.D.3d 437, 975 N.Y.S.2d 872

This text of 112 A.D.3d 437 (SSM Consulting LLC v. CTI Teksource LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SSM Consulting LLC v. CTI Teksource LLC, 112 A.D.3d 437, 975 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered June 1, 2012, to the extent that it denied the motion for summary judgment of defendants CTI Teksource I, Inc., Steven Tucker and SSM Consulting, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly found the exception to the non-compete clauses ambiguous (see Greenfield v Philles Records, 98 [438]*438NY2d 562, 569-570 [2002]). Given the ambiguity, there are issues of fact as to the specific conduct defendant Tucker was prohibited from engaging in and whether his conduct was impermissibly competitive or de minimis. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.
780 N.E.2d 166 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.3d 437, 975 N.Y.S.2d 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ssm-consulting-llc-v-cti-teksource-llc-nyappdiv-2013.