SSD Distribution System, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

539 N.E.2d 1121, 43 Ohio St. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 105
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 1989·No. No. 88-2193·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

[174]*174On authority of Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Straley (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 372, 533 N.E. 2d 764, we hold that an employer may not recover damages against a third party whose negligence caused an employee’s injury absent a legal relationship based upon- contract or warranty between the employer and the third party.

We decline to exercise our discretion under Rule XVI to address questions one and two at this time, absent a showing that there is a need to do so.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents. Holmes, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SSD Distribution System, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., 539 N.E.2d 1121, 43 Ohio St. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 105 (Ohio 1989).

539 N.E.2d 1121 (SSD Distribution System, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related