(SS) Weathers v. Commissioner of Social Security

E.D. California

(SS) Weathers v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedJune 24, 2024

Docket1:24-cv-00048

StatusUnknown

This text of (SS) Weathers v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Weathers v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(SS) Weathers v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES MARCUS WEATHERS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00048-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND 13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE1 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 15 SECURITY, (Doc. No. 16)

16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 (Doc. No. 12) 18

19 20 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed June 20, 2024. (Doc. 21 No. 16). Plaintiff James Marcus Weathers and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that 22 this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 23 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 24 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 25 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 27 §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10).

28 1 | See Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 2 | the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The 3 | Melkonyan court recognized 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) contemplates only two types of remand — 4 | sentence four or sentence six. Jd. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a 5 | judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without 6 || resetting the cause for a rehearing.” Jd. (other citations omitted). 7 The Court grants the parties’ motion to remand under sentence four and reverses the 8 | Commissioner’s final decision. As agreed upon by the parties, upon remand, the Commissioner 9 | will reevaluate the evidence of record, and issue a new decision. 10 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 11 1. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), the Court grants the joint motion to 12 remand (Doc. No. 16) and REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision. This case is 13 REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings 14 consistent with this Order. 15 2. A motion for attorney fees may be filed within thirty (30) days. 16 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is MOOT. 17 4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate any deadlines, and close 18 this case. 19 | Dated: _ June 24, 2024 Mile. Wh. foareh Zaskth 1 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES MARCUS WEATHERS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00048-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND 13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE1 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 15 SECURITY, (Doc. No. 16)

16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 (Doc. No. 12) 18

19 20 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed June 20, 2024. (Doc. 21 No. 16). Plaintiff James Marcus Weathers and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that 22 this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 23 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 24 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 25 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 27 §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10).

28 1 | See Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 2 | the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The 3 | Melkonyan court recognized 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) contemplates only two types of remand — 4 | sentence four or sentence six. Jd. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a 5 | judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without 6 || resetting the cause for a rehearing.” Jd. (other citations omitted). 7 The Court grants the parties’ motion to remand under sentence four and reverses the 8 | Commissioner’s final decision. As agreed upon by the parties, upon remand, the Commissioner 9 | will reevaluate the evidence of record, and issue a new decision. 10 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 11 1. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), the Court grants the joint motion to 12 remand (Doc. No. 16) and REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision. This case is 13 REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings 14 consistent with this Order. 15 2. A motion for attorney fees may be filed within thirty (30) days. 16 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is MOOT. 17 4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate any deadlines, and close 18 this case. 19 | Dated: _ June 24, 2024 Mile. Wh. foareh Zaskth 1 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(SS) Weathers v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-weathers-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack