(SS) Venkaiya v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 7, 2024·No. 2:22-cv-02189·Unknown

Opinion

REGINALD VENKAIYA, No. 2:22-cv-2189-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 9, 13, 15.) SECURITY, Defendant. On October 18, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 15), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 15) are ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 9) is DENIED; 3. The Commissioner’s cross-motion (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED; 4. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Dated: February 6, 2024 <7 ° hu rlASX SENIOR UNITED STATES URTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Venkaiya v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(SS) Venkaiya v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Venkaiya v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)