(SS) Strope v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 23, 2022·No. 1:20-cv-01222·Unknown

Opinion

SARAH MARIE STROPE, Case No. 1:20-cv-01222-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER v. THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (Doc. No. 22) SECURITY, Defendant. Pending before the court is the parties’ stipulated motion for attorney fees filed on May 18, 2022. (Doc. No. 22). The parties agree to an award attorney’s fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney, Melissa Newel, in the amount of $9,131.26 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Id. at 2). On March 7, 2022, this Court entered an order reversing the Commissioner’s decision and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 20 at 1-11). Judgment was entered the same day. (Doc. No. 21). Plaintiff now requests an award of fees as the prevailing party under that order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a) & (d)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); see 28 U.S.C. § 1920; cf. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993) (concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party). The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. (Doc. No. 22 at 2). After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees and costs, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If Plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's stipulated motion for attorney fees and expenses (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $9,131.26 (nine thousand one hundred thirty- one dollars and twenty-six cents) in attorney fees and expenses. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government shall make payment of the fees to Plaintiffs counsel, Melissa Newel, in accordance with Plaintiffs assignment of fees and subject to the terms of the stipulated motion. 'S | Dated: _ May 23, 2022 Mile. Wh. foareh Zaskth HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Strope v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

(SS) Strope v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Strope v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)