(SS) Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security

E.D. California

(SS) Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedJanuary 20, 2023

Docket1:18-cv-01388

StatusUnknown

This text of (SS) Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(SS) Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 RONNIE SANDERS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01388-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION REOPENING ACTION 13 v.

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 9)

15 Defendant.

16 17 By stipulation of the parties, the Court remanded this action on February 22, 2019, pursuant 18 to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to the Commissioner for further administrative action. 19 (Docs. 7-8). On January 10, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to reopen. (Doc. 10). 20 “[S]entence six remands do not constitute final judgments.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 21 F.3d 852, 855 (9th Cir. 2022). Therefore, in a sentence-six remand case, the Court retains 22 jurisdiction following remand. Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98-99 (1991). The 23 Commissioner is to return to the court following completion of the administrative proceedings 24 on remand so that the court may enter a final judgment. Id.; see also Davis v. Astrue, No. 1:08- 25 cv-00525-JLT, 2011 WL 4620954, *1 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011) (reopening action following 26 voluntary remand to permit resolution of the case). Therefore, it is appropriate to reopen this 27 action. / / / 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. The action is reopened; 3 2. Defendant shall file an answer and certified administrative record within 90 days of 4 this order. 5 6 IS SO ORDERED. 7| Dated: _January 20, 2023 _ [nr DR~ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 RONNIE SANDERS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01388-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION REOPENING ACTION 13 v.

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 9)

15 Defendant.

16 17 By stipulation of the parties, the Court remanded this action on February 22, 2019, pursuant 18 to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to the Commissioner for further administrative action. 19 (Docs. 7-8). On January 10, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to reopen. (Doc. 10). 20 “[S]entence six remands do not constitute final judgments.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 21 F.3d 852, 855 (9th Cir. 2022). Therefore, in a sentence-six remand case, the Court retains 22 jurisdiction following remand. Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98-99 (1991). The 23 Commissioner is to return to the court following completion of the administrative proceedings 24 on remand so that the court may enter a final judgment. Id.; see also Davis v. Astrue, No. 1:08- 25 cv-00525-JLT, 2011 WL 4620954, *1 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011) (reopening action following 26 voluntary remand to permit resolution of the case). Therefore, it is appropriate to reopen this 27 action. / / / 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. The action is reopened; 3 2. Defendant shall file an answer and certified administrative record within 90 days of 4 this order. 5 6 IS SO ORDERED. 7| Dated: _January 20, 2023 _ [nr DR~ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(SS) Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-sanders-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack