(SS) Saesee v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 9, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-01562·Unknown

Opinion

Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney at Law: 119433 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC 12631 East Imperial Highway Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Eena Saesee

EENA SAESEE, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01562-SKO ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF vs. ) ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES ) PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. Acting Commissioner of Social ) § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT Security, ) TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 ) Defendant. ) (Doc. 21) ) OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Eena Saesee be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of four thousand four hundred forty dollars ($4,440.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of four hundred two dollars ($402.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Saesee, the government will consider the matter of Saesee's assignment of EAJA fees to Lawrence D. Rohlfing. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Saesee, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Saesee does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC, pursuant to the assignment executed by Saesee.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Lawrence D. Rohlfing. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Eena Saesee's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount

shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Saesee and/or Lawrence D. Rohlfing including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Lawrence D. Rohlfing and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC to seek Social Security Act

1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. DATE: November 7, 2022 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING, INC., CPC

/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing BY: _________________________ Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney for plaintiff Eena Saesee

DATED: November 7, 2022 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney Associate General Counsel Social Security Administration

/s/ Andrea Banks

Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization)

ORDER

Based upon the parties’ foregoing Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation”) (Doc. 21), IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of four thousand four hundred forty dollars ($4,440.00) under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of four hundred two dollars ($402.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 9, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Saesee v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

(SS) Saesee v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Saesee v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)