(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security

E.D. California

(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedMarch 16, 2021

Docket1:21-cv-00420

StatusUnknown

This text of (SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 EMMA RILEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00420-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE LONG FORM 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, APPLICATION

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 2)

16 TWENTY DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Emma Riley (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action seeking review of the final 19 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) 20 Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in 21 forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, Plaintiff’s application does not provide 22 sufficient information for the Court to determine if she is entitled to proceed in this action 23 without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff indicates that she is supported by her husband and their 24 family income is $1,804.00 per month. (ECF No. 2.) 25 In order to proceed in court without prepayment of the filing fee, Plaintiff must submit an 26 affidavit demonstrating that she “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. 27 § 1915(a)(1). The right to proceed without prepayment of fees in a civil case is a privilege and not a right. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 1 194, 198 n.2 (1993); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1231 (9th Cir. 1984) (“permission to 2 proceed in forma pauperis is itself a matter of privilege and not right; denial of in forma pauperis 3 status does not violate the applicant’s right to due process”). A plaintiff need not be absolutely 4 destitute to proceed in forma pauperis and the application is sufficient if it states that due to his 5 poverty he is unable to pay the costs and still be able to provide himself and his dependents with 6 the necessities of life. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 7 Whether to grant or deny an application to proceed without prepayment of fees is an exercise of 8 the district court’s discretion. Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1236 (9th Cir. 2015). 9 In assessing whether a certain income level meets the poverty threshold under Section 10 1915(a)(1), courts look to the federal poverty guidelines developed each year by the Department 11 of Health and Human Services. See, e.g., Paco v. Myers, No. CIV. 13-00701 ACK, 2013 WL 12 6843057 (D. Haw. Dec. 26, 2013); Lint v. City of Boise, No. CV09-72-S-EJL, 2009 WL 13 1149442, at *2 (D. Idaho Apr. 28, 2009) (and cases cited therein). 14 Based on the income reported which is $1,804.00 per month, Plaintiff’s household 15 income is $21,648.00 per year. The 2021 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 contiguous states for a 16 household of two is $17,420.00. 2021 Poverty Guidelines, https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty- 17 guidelines (last visited March 15, 2021). Based on the information provided, it does not appear 18 that Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action. 19 Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to complete and file an Application to Proceed 20 in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) – AO 239. If Plaintiff is 21 unwilling to complete and submit the long form application, Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in 22 full. 23 Based upon the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice; 25 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward an Application to Proceed in District 26 Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) – AO 239 to Plaintiff; 27 3. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either (1) pay the 1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long 2 Form) — AO 239; and 3 4. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action shall be dismissed for failure 4 to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with a court order. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf ee 7 | Dated: _March 16, 2021 _ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 EMMA RILEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00420-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE LONG FORM 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, APPLICATION

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 2)

16 TWENTY DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Emma Riley (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action seeking review of the final 19 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) 20 Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in 21 forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, Plaintiff’s application does not provide 22 sufficient information for the Court to determine if she is entitled to proceed in this action 23 without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff indicates that she is supported by her husband and their 24 family income is $1,804.00 per month. (ECF No. 2.) 25 In order to proceed in court without prepayment of the filing fee, Plaintiff must submit an 26 affidavit demonstrating that she “is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. 27 § 1915(a)(1). The right to proceed without prepayment of fees in a civil case is a privilege and not a right. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 1 194, 198 n.2 (1993); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1231 (9th Cir. 1984) (“permission to 2 proceed in forma pauperis is itself a matter of privilege and not right; denial of in forma pauperis 3 status does not violate the applicant’s right to due process”). A plaintiff need not be absolutely 4 destitute to proceed in forma pauperis and the application is sufficient if it states that due to his 5 poverty he is unable to pay the costs and still be able to provide himself and his dependents with 6 the necessities of life. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 7 Whether to grant or deny an application to proceed without prepayment of fees is an exercise of 8 the district court’s discretion. Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1236 (9th Cir. 2015). 9 In assessing whether a certain income level meets the poverty threshold under Section 10 1915(a)(1), courts look to the federal poverty guidelines developed each year by the Department 11 of Health and Human Services. See, e.g., Paco v. Myers, No. CIV. 13-00701 ACK, 2013 WL 12 6843057 (D. Haw. Dec. 26, 2013); Lint v. City of Boise, No. CV09-72-S-EJL, 2009 WL 13 1149442, at *2 (D. Idaho Apr. 28, 2009) (and cases cited therein). 14 Based on the income reported which is $1,804.00 per month, Plaintiff’s household 15 income is $21,648.00 per year. The 2021 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 contiguous states for a 16 household of two is $17,420.00. 2021 Poverty Guidelines, https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty- 17 guidelines (last visited March 15, 2021). Based on the information provided, it does not appear 18 that Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action. 19 Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to complete and file an Application to Proceed 20 in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) – AO 239. If Plaintiff is 21 unwilling to complete and submit the long form application, Plaintiff must pay the filing fee in 22 full. 23 Based upon the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice; 25 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward an Application to Proceed in District 26 Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) – AO 239 to Plaintiff; 27 3. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either (1) pay the 1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long 2 Form) — AO 239; and 3 4. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action shall be dismissed for failure 4 to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with a court order. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf ee 7 | Dated: _March 16, 2021 _ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(SS) Riley v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-riley-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack