(SS) Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security

E.D. California

(SS) Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedMarch 10, 2020

Docket1:19-cv-00700

StatusUnknown

This text of (SS) Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(SS) Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 PATRICIA KATHRYN OBRIEN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0700 JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. )

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) (Doc. 18) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 On March 20, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 18) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the 23 Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: March 9, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 PATRICIA KATHRYN OBRIEN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0700 JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. )

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) (Doc. 18) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 On March 20, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 18) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of 20 dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the 21 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the 23 Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 Dated: March 9, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(SS) Obrien v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-obrien-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack