(SS) Milavong v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 17, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00278·Unknown

Opinion

SAMLY MILAVONG, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0278 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES ) PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO Commissioner of Social Security1, ) ) (Docs. 23, 25) Defendant. ) )

Samly Milavong seeks an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $7,190.03 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Doc. 23.) The magistrate judge found Plaintiff was a prevailing party. (Doc. 25 at 2.) The magistrate judge also observed the Commissioner did not argue the position on appeal was justified, because the Commissioner did not oppose the fee request. (See id. at 2-3.) The magistrate judge determined the requested amount was reasonable, based upon the hourly rates, number of hours worked, and the results obtained. (Id. at 3-6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court grant the motion. (Id. at 6.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on all parties and notified them that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 25 at 7.) The Court advised the parties that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the wavier of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s

1 Frank Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security on May 6, 2025. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal factual findings’ on appeal.” (Ud., quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) Neither party filed objections, and the time to do so has passed. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated July 2, 2025 (Doc. 25) are ADOPTED in full. 2. Plaintiff's motion for attorneys’ fees (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff is AWARDED fees in the amount of $7,190.03 pursuant to the EAJA. 4. Ifthe Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, th Government SHALL issue the fee award directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the Assignment Agreement executed by Plaintiff and her counsel. Dated: _ July 17, 2025 ( LAW ph L. wan TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Milavong v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(SS) Milavong v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Milavong v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. Wilkerson v. B. Wheeler
772 F.3d 834 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)