(SS) Guerrero v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

1 Jonathan O. Peña, Esq. 2 CA Bar ID No.: 278044 Peña & Bromberg, PLC 3 3467 W. Shaw Ave., Ste 100 4 Fresno, CA 93711 Telephone: 559-439-9700 5 Facsimile: 559-439-9723 6 Email: info@jonathanpena.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Miguel Angel Guerrero 7

8 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 Miguel Angel Guerrero, Case No. 1:24-cv-01484-KES-BAM

13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD v. FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT 16 Frank Bisignano1, COMMISIONER JUSTICE ACT; ORDER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 17 18 Defendant. 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their 20 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded 21 attorney fees and expenses in the amount of EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE AND 22 44/100 ($881.44) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), 23 and costs in the amount of ZERO dollars ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. §1920. This amount 24 25 1 Frank Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security on May 6, 2025. 26 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank Bisignano should be substituted for Leland Dudek as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be 27 taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel 2 in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d). 3 Plaintiff was the prevailing party in this matter and Plaintiff is an individual 4 whose net worth does not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the civil action was filed. 5 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will 6 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. 7 Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this 8 Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program 9 (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to 10 Plaintiff and not to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, 11 the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned his right to EAJA fees to 12 his attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset 13 under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the 14 Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, 15 16 JONATHAN O. PEÑA-MANCINAS at the firm, PEÑA & BROMBERG, PC. 17 However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner 18 cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining 19 EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check or electronic fund transfer (EFT) made 20 out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney, JONATHAN O. PEÑA- 21 MANCINAS at the firm, PEÑA & BROMBERG, PC. 22 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for 23 EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 24 Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute 25 a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel 26 including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with 27 this action. 1 The parties further agree that the EAJA award is without prejudice to the right of 2 Plaintiff’s attorney to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 3 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 4 2412(c)(1) (2006). 5 Respectfully submitted, 6

7 Dated: May 12, 2025 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña 8 J ONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff 9

10 Dated: May 12, 2025 MICHELLE BECKWITH 11 Acting United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE 12 Associate General Counsel 13 Office of Program Litigation Social Security Administration 14

15 By: _*_Justin Lane Martin Justin Lane Martin 16 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 17 Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature 18 obtained via email on May 12, 2025). 19

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 3 4 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access 5 || to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (Doc. 15), 6 IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of EIGHT HUNDRED 7 || EIGHT Y-ONE DOLLARS AND 44/100 ($881.44) as authorized by the Equal Access 8 || to Justice Act (““EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the 9 || Stipulation. 10 11 || IS SO ORDERED. _ 12 Dated: _ May 12, 2025 4h . 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -A-