(SS) Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 14, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00750·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10

11 ANGEL LUIS ALEMAN GONZALEZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0750 JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION 13 v. )

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. ) (Doc. 17) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 On July 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- 18 captioned action is dismissed in its entirety. (Doc. 17.) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the 19 plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by 20 all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it 21 “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); 22 Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court 23 is DIRECTED to close this action. 24

26 Dated: July 14, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 27 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(SS) Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)