(SS) Gillit v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 16, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-01542·Unknown

Opinion

JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB# 103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 (916) 488-3030 (916) 489-9297 fax Attorney for Plaintiff

-o0O0o-

MARIE GILLIT, ) No. 2:19-cv-01542-KJN(SS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATION AND v. ) ORDER ) APPROVING SETTLEMENT Kilolo Kijakazi ) OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) THE EQUAL ACCESS TO SECURITY, ) JUSTICE ACT [28 U.S.C. §2412(d)] ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

THE PARTIES STIPULATE through the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) and that there will be no award of costs. This will represent compensation for all legal services rendered by counsel for plaintiff in this civil action, including Ninth Circuit case no. 20-17123, and in accordance with that statute. Upon the Court’s order, defendant will consider the assignment of those EAJA fees pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), considering any offsets allowed under the United States Department of Treasury’s Offset Program. Fees shall be made payable to plaintiff, but if the Treasury Department determines plaintiff owes no federal debt, then the government shall pay the fees directly to Jesse S. Kaplan based on an assignment executed by plaintiff and will deliver the payment to said counsel. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of plaintiff’s request for EAJA fees and not an admission of liability of defendant under the EAJA. Payment of this agreed amount shall constitute a complete release and bar of plaintiff and her counsel regarding EAJA fees relating to this action, including Ninth Circuit case no. 20-17123. This award is without prejudice to plaintiff’s counsel’s right to fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Dated: November 9, 2021 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: November 9, 2021 /s/ per email authorization SHEA BOND Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant

° GOOD CAUSE APPEARING from the foregoing stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that defendant pay plaintiff's attorney fees of $10,000.00 under the EAJA in accordance with this

stipulation. Dated: November 16, 2021 FresiQ Newser aise UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[Pleading Title] - 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Gillit v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(SS) Gillit v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Gillit v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)