(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GINA FLORES o/b/o Z.E.C., Case No. 1:24-cv-00807-SAB

11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION APPOINTING GINA FLORES AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR 12 v. PLAINTIFF Z.E.C.

13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 7.) SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Gina Flores on behalf of minor Z.E.C., filed a complaint on July 10, 2024, 17 challenging a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for 18 disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) On August 14, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an 19 application for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. (ECF No. 6.) On the same date, Plaintiff 20 filed an application to appoint Plaintiff’s mother, Gina Flores as guardian ad litem. (ECF No. 7.) 21 The Court finds good cause to grant the application. 22 Pursuant to Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a representative of a minor or 23 incompetent person may sue or defend on the minor or incompetent person’s behalf. Fed. R. Civ. 24 P. 17(c). This requires the Court to take whatever measures it deems appropriate to protect the 25 interests of the individual during the litigation. U.S. v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, 26 Situated in Klickitat Cty., State of Wash., 795 F.2d 796, 805 (9th Cir. 1986). The appointment of 27 the guardian ad litem is more than a mere formality. Id. “A guardian ad litem is authorized to act 28 on behalf of his ward and may make all appropriate decisions in the course of specific litigation.” 1 | Id. A guardian ad litem need not possess any special qualifications, but he must “be truly 2 || dedicated to the best interests of the person on whose behalf he seeks to litigate.” AT&T 3 | Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, 143 F. Supp. 3d 1042, 1054 (E.D. Cal. 2015). This means that the 4 | guardian ad litem cannot face an impermissible conflict of interest with the ward and courts 5 || consider the candidate’s “experience, objectivity, and expertise” or previous relationship with the 6 | ward. Id. (citations omitted). 7 “[W]hen a parent brings an action on behalf of a child, and it is evident that the interests 8 | of each are the same, no need exists for someone other than the parent to represent the child’s 9 | interests under Rule 17(c).” Gonzalez v. Reno, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 1185 (S.D. Fla.), aff'd, 212 10 | F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000). While a parent is generally appointed as a guardian ad litem, there 11 | are situations where the best interests of the minor and the interests of the parent conflict. 12 | Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, No. 1:06-cv-01165 AWI NEW (TAG), 2007 WL 1390672, at *2 13 | (E.D. Cal. May 9, 2007). Therefore, a parent is not entitled as a matter of right to act as guardian 14 | ad litem for the child. Id., at *2. 15 The Court has considered the petition of Gina Flores for appointment as guardian ad litem 16 | for Z.E.C. and finds that no conflict that would preclude her from serving as guardian ad litem. 17 | (ECF No. 7.) The filing indicates Z.E.C. is the child of Gina Flores, and that Gina Flores is a 18 | competent and responsible person that is willing to act as guardian and is familiar with the 19 | medical conditions of Z.E.C. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. The motion to appoint guardian ad litem (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED; and 22 2. Gina Flores is appointed guardian ad litem for minor Z.E.C. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf ee 25 | Dated: August 15, 2024

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27 28