(SS) Fain v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 20, 2023·No. 1:22-cv-01257·Unknown

Opinion

Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides 1990 N. California Blvd. Suite 20 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 222-7071 Fax: (925) 522-5306 Email: francesco@benavidesdisabilitylaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff TINA FAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

TINA FAIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01257-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION AND v. AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS Commissioner of Social Security, TO JUSTICE ACT

Defendant. (Doc. 19)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $7,500.00, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d), 1920. After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices of Francesco Benavides, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. Any EAJA funds paid directly to Plaintiff’s attorney may be made via EFT or check. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 16, 2023 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides By: /s/ Francesco Benavides Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: November 16, 2023 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel Social Security Administration By: Lars Nelson* Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature obtained via email on November 15, 2023).

Based upon the parties’ foregoing Stipulation and Unopposed Motion for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (Doc. 19), IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $7,500.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

Dated: November 17, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Fain v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(SS) Fain v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Fain v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)