(SS) Day v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

Jonathan O. Peña, Esq. CA Bar ID No.: 278044 Peña & Bromberg, PLC 3467 W. Shaw Ave., Ste 100 Fresno, CA 93711 Telephone: 559-439-9700 Facsimile: 559-439-9723 Email: info@jonathanpena.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Curtis Anthony Day

FRESNO DIVISION Curtis Anthony Day, Case No. 2:24-cv-0137-JDP

Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD v. FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT Frank Bisignano1, COMMISIONER JUSTICE ACT; |PROPOSED| ORDER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of ELEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED-FIFTY AND 00/100 ($11,250.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO dollars ($0.00) under 1 Frank Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security on May 7, 2025. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank Bisignano should be substituted for Leland Dudek as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 28 U.S.C. §1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d). Plaintiff was the prevailing party in this matter and Plaintiff is an individual whose net worth does not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the civil action was filed. After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to Plaintiff and not to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned his right to EAJA fees to his attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, JONATHAN O. PEÑA-MANCINAS at the firm, PEÑA & BROMBERG, PC. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check or electronic fund transfer (EFT) made out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney, JONATHAN O. PEÑA- MANCINAS at the firm, PEÑA & BROMBERG, PC. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel including Counsel’s firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. The parties further agree that the EAJA award is without prejudice to the right of Plaintiff’s attorney to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1) (2006). Accordingly, Plaintiff withdraws the Motion for EAJA Fees filed on June 26, 2025, Dkt. No. 22. Respectfully submitted,

Dated: July 7, 2025 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña J ONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: July 7, 2025 MICHELLE BECKWITH Acting United States Attorney Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation Social Security Administration

By: _*_Marcelo N. Illarmo Marcelo N. Illarmo Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature obtained via email on July 7, 2025)

{PROPOSED! ORDER Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation’”), IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of ELEVEN

THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED-FIFTY AND 00/100 ($11,250.00) as authorized by the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the ° terms of the Stipulation. IT IS SO ORDERED. / Dated: __ July 8, 2025 Jessa (ose JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE _4-