(SS) Blanco v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 18, 2023·No. 1:21-cv-00028·Unknown

Opinion

BETSY AMY BLANCO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-0028 JLT GSA ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL, AND REMANDING ) THE ACTION FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ) (Docs. 24, 26) ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF BETSY AMY ) BLANCO AND AGAINST DEFENDANT Defendant. ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Betsy Amy Blanco requested judicial review of the administrative decision denying her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. (See Doc. 24.) The magistrate judge found the decision of the administrative law judge erred in addressing the medical record, and the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. (Doc. 26.) The magistrate judge determined that “[r]emand is appropriate for the ALJ to accurately discuss the developments beginning with the March 5, 2020 cervical MRI through the date of the ALJ’s decision and reach a well-reasoned conclusion about the impact on Plaintiff’s functional status in the months leading up to [her] surgery and thereafter.” (Id. at 17.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court decline to uphold the decision of the ALJ and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Id.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on all parties, and it notified them that any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service. (Doc. 26 at 17.) The Court also advised them that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” Cd. at 18, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834,838-39 (9th Cir. 2014), Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) To date, no objections have been filed and the time d so has expired. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated June 2, 2023 (Doc. 26) are ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's appeal of the administrative decision (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. 3. The matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for furthe proceedings. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Betsy Amy Blanc and against Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Dated: _ July 17, 2023 ( LAW pA L. wan TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Blanco v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(SS) Blanco v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Blanco v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related