(SS) Beltran v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of (SS) Beltran v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Beltran v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 Melissa Newel (#148563) NEWEL LAW 2 2625 Alcatraz Ave., Suite 132 Berkeley, CA 94705 3 (510) 316-3827 4 mnewel@newellawfirm.com
5 Attorney for Plaintiff JESUS AUGUSTINE BELTRAN, JR. 6
7 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 8 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 9 CAROL S. CLARK Social Security Administration 10 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 11 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 977-8975 12 Carol.S.Clark@ssa.gov
13 Attorneys for Defendant
15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 JESUS AUGUSTINE BELTRAN, JR., No. 1:18-CV-1431 (BAM) 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 21 AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ANDREW SAUL1, ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE 22 COMMISSIONER OF EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (28 SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S.C. §2412(d)) 23 Defendant. 24
25 26 27 1 Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 42 U.S.C. §405(g), 28 Andrew Saul is hereby substituted as the named defendant in the above-captioned action. 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 2 attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Jesus Augustine Beltran, Jr. (Plaintiff) be 3 awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412 (d), in the 4 amount of three thousand and sixteen dollars and eighty-one cents ($3,016.81). This represents 5 compensation for legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this 6 civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §2412 (d). 7 After the Court issues an Order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider 8 the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. 9 Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the 10 attorney fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the 11 Treasury’s Offset Program. After the Order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will 12 determine whether they are subject to any offset. 13 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines 14 that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt subject to offset, then the government shall cause the 15 payment of fees approved to be made payable to Melissa Newel or Newel Law (collectively 16 “Plaintiff’s counsel”), pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Fees shall remain payable 17 to Plaintiff absent assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any and all payments made shall be 18 delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 19 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA 20 attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under 21 EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any 22 and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees 23 and expenses in connection with this action. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security 2 Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the provisions of the EAJA.
3 Respectfully submitted, 4 Dated: August 19, 2019 NEWEL LAW 5
6 By: Melissa Newel 7 Melissa Newel Attorney for Plaintiff 8 JESUS AUGUSTINE BELTRAN, JR.
10 Dated: August 19, 2019 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 11 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 12 Social Security Administration
13 By: Carol S. Clark* 14 CAROL S. CLARK (*Authorized by email dated 08/19/2019 15 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 16
18 ORDER
19 Based upon the parties’ stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. §2412, fees in the amount of three thousand sixteen dollars and eighty-one cents 21 ($3,016.81) be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: August 21, 2019 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(SS) Beltran v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-beltran-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2019.