(SS) Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 18, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00072·Unknown

Opinion

SBCA # 314717 2 Lehrkind Law Office, P.C. 3 2625 Alcatraz Ave, # 208 Berkeley, CA 94705 4 Tel: 510-590-1907 Margaret@LehrkindLawOffice.com 5

6 9 RENESHA JAMIKA ANTHONY, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00072-DMC 10 Plaintiff, 11 STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND vs. 12 PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13 ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER 14 Defendant

15 The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby agree that attorney fees in the 16 17 amount of $9,000 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 18 (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and $0 costs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Such attorney fees shall 19 be subject to verification that Plaintiff has no debt that qualifies for offset, pursuant to the 20 Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). 21 If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not 22 23 subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the 24 check or electronic funds transfer for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, 25 Margaret Lehrkind, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to her. See Exhibit – 26 27 STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER - 1 28 1 Retainer Agreement. If Plaintiff has a debt, then any remaining funds after offset shall be made 2 payable to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s address. 3 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA 4 attorney fees and expenses and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 5 6 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 7 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to 8 EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 9 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security 10 Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 11 12 13 DATE: July 17, 2025 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Lehrkind Law Office, P.C.

16 By: /s/ Margaret Lehrkind Attorney for Plaintiff 18 DATE: July 17, 2025 By: /s/ *Margaret Branick-Abilla 19 MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA 20 *As authorized via email on July 17, 2025 Special Assistant United States Attorney 21 Attorney for Defendant

26 27 STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER - 2 28 1 ORDER 3 || Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act 4 || Fees and Expenses (the “Stipulation”), > IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $9,000 as authorized by the 6 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and $0 in costs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 7 3 § 1920 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 'T Dated: July 17, 2025 12 13 _ DENNIS M. COTA 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 || STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND 38 EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER - 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(SS) Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(SS) Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) Anthony v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)