(SS) A.J.M v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of (SS) A.J.M v. Commissioner of Social Security ((SS) A.J.M v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 NANCY MORENO O/B/O MINOR A.J.M., Case No. 1:24-cv-01540-BAM
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM 13 v. OF A.J.M.
14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 3) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Nancy Moreno on behalf of minor A.J.M. (“Plaintiff”), through counsel, filed 18 this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security 19 Administration. (Doc. 1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Nancy Moreno’s petition for 20 appointment as guardian ad litem for her child, A.J.M., a minor. 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 provides that “[t]he court must appoint a guardian ad 22 litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is 23 unrepresented in an action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). This requires a district court to take 24 whatever measures it deems proper to protect the individual during litigation. United States v. 25 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796, 805 (9th Cir. 1986). In pertinent part, Local Rule 202(a) of 26 this Court further states:
27 Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor or incompetent person, the attorney representing 1 the minor or incompetent person shall present . . . a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court, or . . . a showing satisfactory to the Court that no 2 such appointment is necessary to ensure adequate representation of the minor or incompetent person. 3 4 See L.R. 202(a). The decision to appoint a guardian ad litem “must normally be left to the sound 5 discretion of the trial court.” 30.64 Acres, 795 F.2d at 804. 6 “[W]hen a parent brings an action on behalf of a child, and it is evident that the interests 7 of each are the same, no need exists for someone other than the parent to represent the child’s 8 interests under Rule 17(c).” H.D.A. v. County of Stanislaus, No. 1:22-cv-00384-DAD-SAB, 2022 9 WL 992990, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2022) (quoting Gonzalez v. Reno, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 10 1185 (S.D. Fla.), aff'd, 212 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000)). “While a parent is generally appointed 11 as a guardian ad litem, there are situations where the best interests of the minor and the interests 12 of the parent conflict.” Id. (citing Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, No. 1:06-cv-01165 AWI NEW 13 (TAG), 2007 WL 1390672, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 9, 2007)). Therefore, a parent is not entitled as 14 a matter of right to act as guardian ad litem for the child. Id. 15 The Court has considered the petition and finds no apparent conflict that would preclude 16 A.J.M.’s mother from serving as guardian ad litem. The supporting declaration of Nancy 17 Moreno indicates the following: (1) she is the mother of A.J.M., a minor; (2) she is competent to 18 prosecute the action for A.J.M.; and (3) she has no interest adverse to the rights of A.J.M. (Doc. 19 3 at 4, Declaration of Nancy Moreno ¶¶ 1, 3-4.) Additionally, the petition indicates that Nancy 20 Moreno is a competent and responsible person, she is fully competent to act as a guardian ad 21 litem, she is familiar with A.J.M.’s medical conditions, and she is willing to act as guardian ad 22 litem. (Doc. 3 at 2.) 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Nancy Moreno is appointed in this action 24 as guardian ad litem for A.J.M., a minor. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: December 19, 2024 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(SS) A.J.M v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ss-ajm-v-commissioner-of-social-security-caed-2024.