Srzedzinski v. Burgess
This text of 135 So. 3d 360 (Srzedzinski v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The former husband, Joseph M. Srzed-zinski, appeals the final judgment dissolving his marriage to the former wife, Latisha Burgess, asserting numerous errors. We affirm in all respects except as to one issue relating to the parenting plan. The final judgment denied the former wife’s request to relocate with the child from Seminole County to Hillsborough County, and provided that the former wife’s address would be used for school boundary determination and registration. However, the parenting plan reflects the former wife’s Hillsborough County address. On remand, the trial court shall require the parties’ child to be returned to Seminole County. Should the former wife fail to return with the child, the trial court shall reconsider the time sharing arrangement and the address utilized for school purposes.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 So. 3d 360, 2013 WL 6816688, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/srzedzinski-v-burgess-fladistctapp-2013.