Srulevitch v. Friedman
This text of 7 A.D.2d 915 (Srulevitch v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In proceedings supplementary to judgment, third-party orders were made which, inter alia, restrained any disposition of funds on deposit in two banks in appellant’s name. The appeal is from an order which, inter alia, (1) denied appellant’s motion to vacate the third-party orders and (2) authorized respondent to maintain an action pursuant to section 795 of the Civil Practice Act. Order affirmed, with $19 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 915, 183 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/srulevitch-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1959.