Srogi v. New York Central Railroad

261 A.D. 1039, 26 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8633

This text of 261 A.D. 1039 (Srogi v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Srogi v. New York Central Railroad, 261 A.D. 1039, 26 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the doctrine of last clear chance is not applicable to the facts of the case. (Woloszynowski v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 254 N. Y. 206; Hernandez v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 284 id. 535.) (The judgment is for plaintiff in a railroad negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woloszynowski v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.
172 N.E. 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 1039, 26 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/srogi-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1941.