SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis
8 N.E.3d 962, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1492
Opinion
Butler App. Nos. CA2012-11-239 and CA2013-05-068, 2014-Ohio-71. On review of order certifying a conflict, the court determines that a conflict exists on both issues certified. The parties are to brief issue 1 stated on pages 2-3 of the court of appeals’ entry filed March 12, 2014:
“In order to establish standing in a foreclosure action and invoke the jurisdiction of the common pleas court, must the plaintiff establish at the time complaint for foreclosure is filed that it has an interest in both the note and the mortgage, or is it sufficient if the Plaintiff demonstrates an interest in either the note or the mortgage?”
The conflict case is BAC Home Loans Servicing v. McFerren, 9th Dist. Summit No. 26384, 2013-Ohio-3228.
Issue 2 is held for the decision in 2012-2110, CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski, 5th Dist. Stark No. 2012-CA-93, 2012-Ohio-4901; and briefing schedule stayed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis, 8 N.E.3d 962, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1492 (Ohio 2014).
8 N.E.3d 962 (SRMOF 2009-1 Trust v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. George
2015 Ohio 4957 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Lewis
2014 Ohio 5599 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Bank of America v. Jones
2014 Ohio 4985 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)