SREDL v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections

Missouri Court of Appeals

SREDL v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections

236 S.W.3d 703, 2007 WL 3253486

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 6, 2007

DocketWD 67495

StatusPublished

This text of 236 S.W.3d 703 (SREDL v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SREDL v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, 236 S.W.3d 703, 2007 WL 3253486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

236 S.W.3d 703 (2007)

Steven SREDL, Appellant,
v.
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Missouri Department of Probation and Parole, Dennis Agniel, Darrel Ashlock, Ansel Card, Wayne Crump, Fannie Gaw, Robert Robinson, Donna White, Dana Thompson, Penny Hubbard, Reid K. Forrester, Jeanne Crane, Jerry Smith, Stacy Klein, Rebecca Long, Virgil Lansdown, Donna Coleman, Penny May, Bobby Heidman, Kenneth Caley, Cody Murphy, and Candise Woodruff, Respondents.

No. WD 67495.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

November 6, 2007.

Steven A. Sredl, Tipton, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Shaun Mackelprang and David A. Johnson, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondents.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

ORDER

Steven Sredl appeals the circuit court's judgment to dismiss with prejudice his 10-count petition for failing to state a cause of action for which relief could be granted. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI