Sredl v. Missouri Department of Corrections
This text of 209 S.W.3d 31 (Sredl v. Missouri Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Missouri Department of Corrections (“DOC”) appeals the declaratory judgment providing that a 1993 incarceration for 120 days for a DOC program and subsequent probation, events that occurred before enactment of section 559.115, RSMo Cum. *32 Supp.2001, would not count as a commitment in calculating the mandatory minimum prison term Steven Sredl must serve under section 558.019.2, RSMo 2000, for a 2002 driving while intoxicated conviction, section 577.010, RSMo 2000, in which an eight year prison term was imposed. Thus, the issue is whether section 559.115.7 has retroactive application.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 S.W.3d 31, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888, 2006 WL 3589509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sredl-v-missouri-department-of-corrections-moctapp-2006.