Sredl v. Missouri Department of Corrections

209 S.W.3d 31, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888, 2006 WL 3589509
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2006·No. WD 66476·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Missouri Department of Corrections (“DOC”) appeals the declaratory judgment providing that a 1993 incarceration for 120 days for a DOC program and subsequent probation, events that occurred before enactment of section 559.115, RSMo Cum. *32 Supp.2001, would not count as a commitment in calculating the mandatory minimum prison term Steven Sredl must serve under section 558.019.2, RSMo 2000, for a 2002 driving while intoxicated conviction, section 577.010, RSMo 2000, in which an eight year prison term was imposed. Thus, the issue is whether section 559.115.7 has retroactive application.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sredl v. Missouri Department of Corrections, 209 S.W.3d 31, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1888, 2006 WL 3589509 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

209 S.W.3d 31 (Sredl v. Missouri Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sredl v. Missouri Department of Corrections
223 S.W.3d 185 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)