SR v. State
Opinion
S.R., a juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, SUAREZ, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
We affirm. No objection to the restitution order was raised below and cannot now be raised on appeal. See J.S. v. State, 717 So.2d 175, 177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ("When the trial court questioned the attorneys about the propriety of restitution for lost wages, both attorneys agreed that lost wages were recoverable. Having failed to object to this restitution issue at the hearing, appellant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review.") and cases cited therein; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(e) ("a sentencing error may not be raised on appeal unless the alleged error has first been brought to the attention of the lower tribunal: (1) at the time of sentencing; or (2) by motion pursuant to [rule] 3.800(b)").
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
34 So. 3d 107 (SR v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.