Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.
133 N.Y.S. 916
Opinions
Plaintiff introduced evidence by another attorney which supports the judgment, while defendant offered no testimony as to the value of the services. Under these circumstances, we do not feel that we are justified in reversing a judgment, which involves determining the value of the services otherwise than upon the evidence submitted.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
SEABURY, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co., 133 N.Y.S. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
133 N.Y.S. 916 (Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.
135 N.Y.S. 1144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)