Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.

Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.

133 N.Y.S. 916
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 N.Y.S. 916 (Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co., 133 N.Y.S. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinions

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff introduced evidence by another attorney which supports the judgment, while defendant offered no testimony as to the value of the services. Under these circumstances, we do not feel that we are justified in reversing a judgment, which involves determining the value of the services otherwise than upon the evidence submitted.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SEABURY, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Squires v. Fitzhugh Smith Co.
135 N.Y.S. 1144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.Y.S. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/squires-v-fitzhugh-smith-co-nyappterm-1912.