Squire's Shop, Inc. v. Boehlow

Missouri Court of Appeals

Squire's Shop, Inc. v. Boehlow

482 S.W.2d 738, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 784

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 27, 1972

DocketNo. 34216

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 482 S.W.2d 738 (Squire's Shop, Inc. v. Boehlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Squire's Shop, Inc. v. Boehlow, 482 S.W.2d 738, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 784 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining defendant Joanne Boehiow’s motion to quash plaintiff’s garnishment on garnishee Robert H. Boehiow. The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant Joanne Boehiow in the amount of $261.77 in the Magistrate Court of St. Louis County. Subsequently, a transcript of the judgment was filed in the St. Louis County Circuit Court. That court issued an execution against defendant Joanne Boehiow and a garnishment naming Robert H. Boehiow garnishee. Thereafter, and before the return term of the Writ issued by the Circuit Court, defendant Joanne Boehiow filed a “Motion to Quash Garnishment.” The motion alleged that the garnishee was not a personal debtor of the defendant. It further alleged that Joanne Boehiow and Robert H. Boehiow were divorced, and that under the terms of their divorce decree, defendant was merely a recipient of funds which the court required the garnishee to pay to the defendant for the support of their child, and that, therefore, the funds in question actually belong to the child. It was alleged that she received the funds only as a trustee, and for this reason, they are not subject to her personal debts, or any judgments or executions against her. The di[739]*739vorce decree, originally issued and as modified, was attached to defendant’s motion, showing an award to her of alimony, attorney fees and child support payments.

The defendant Joanne Boehlow failed to file a brief in this court. However, we do not reach the merits of this case, since it is our conclusion that the defendant’s motion was premature and should not have been heard. The plaintiff has a statutory right to file interrogatories to the garnishee at the return term of the Writ. § 525.130 RSMo 1969 V.A.M.S. The return date of this Writ was June 22, 1971. This motion was sustained on April 15, 1971. Therefore, plaintiff was deprived of its right to inquire into the garnishee’s status as a debtor of the defendant. Since the terms of the divorce decree indicate, in addition to child support, that the garnishee is also obligated for alimony and attorney fees, it is entirely possible that the garnishee may be a personal debtor of the defendant. The plaintiff may not be deprived of its rights of discovery by a prematurely sustained motion to quash. Reversed and remanded.

SMITH and SIMEONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining defendant Joanne Boehiow’s motion to quash plaintiff’s garnishment on garnishee Robert H. Boehiow. The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant Joanne Boehiow in the amount of $261.77 in the Magistrate Court of St. Louis County. Subsequently, a transcript of the judgment was filed in the St. Louis County Circuit Court. That court issued an execution against defendant Joanne Boehiow and a garnishment naming Robert H. Boehiow garnishee. Thereafter, and before the return term of the Writ issued by the Circuit Court, defendant Joanne Boehiow filed a “Motion to Quash Garnishment.” The motion alleged that the garnishee was not a personal debtor of the defendant. It further alleged that Joanne Boehiow and Robert H. Boehiow were divorced, and that under the terms of their divorce decree, defendant was merely a recipient of funds which the court required the garnishee to pay to the defendant for the support of their child, and that, therefore, the funds in question actually belong to the child. It was alleged that she received the funds only as a trustee, and for this reason, they are not subject to her personal debts, or any judgments or executions against her. The di[739]*739vorce decree, originally issued and as modified, was attached to defendant’s motion, showing an award to her of alimony, attorney fees and child support payments.

The defendant Joanne Boehlow failed to file a brief in this court. However, we do not reach the merits of this case, since it is our conclusion that the defendant’s motion was premature and should not have been heard. The plaintiff has a statutory right to file interrogatories to the garnishee at the return term of the Writ. § 525.130 RSMo 1969 V.A.M.S. The return date of this Writ was June 22, 1971. This motion was sustained on April 15, 1971. Therefore, plaintiff was deprived of its right to inquire into the garnishee’s status as a debtor of the defendant. Since the terms of the divorce decree indicate, in addition to child support, that the garnishee is also obligated for alimony and attorney fees, it is entirely possible that the garnishee may be a personal debtor of the defendant. The plaintiff may not be deprived of its rights of discovery by a prematurely sustained motion to quash. Reversed and remanded.

SMITH and SIMEONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.2d 738, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/squires-shop-inc-v-boehlow-moctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack