Squillo v. City of New Haven
This text of 14 Conn. Super. Ct. 500 (Squillo v. City of New Haven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrer is addressed to the complaint in so far as it purports to set out a cause of action on behalf of the plaintiff Anthony Squillo, Jr., to recover for injuries he allegedly sustained while en ventre sa mere. *Page 501
Cogent reasoning has been advanced to support a right of recovery by a child for injuries suffered before its birth. Bonbrest
v. Kotz,
Nevertheless in the various jurisdictions where the question has been presented the courts of last resort have uniformly held that in the absence of statute there is no right of action to a child when born for injuries done to it before birth. See notes in 97 A. L. R. 1524 and 5 N.C.C.A. (N.S.) 778; Restatement, 4 Torts § 869.
The demurrer is sustained on the ground stated therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Conn. Super. Ct. 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/squillo-v-city-of-new-haven-connsuperct-1947.